Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin BRONZ 6000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX
