Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €63.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
