Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX and Delphin BRONZ 6000X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Delphin BRONZ 6000X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin BRONZ and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Delphin BRONZ 6000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.07 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag
