Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.85 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight204g / 7.2oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €40.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/285

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
