Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.85 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight204g / 7.2oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €40.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/285

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Delphin RAYA body
