Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.85 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight204g / 7.2oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €40.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/285

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
