Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.85 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight204g / 7.2oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €40.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/285

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin CarbonIX 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 4000D-CXHX
