Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.85 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight204g / 7.2oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €40.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/285

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
