Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
