Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin CarbonIX

Spinning

49.70 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.88 out of 10

Ergonomics6.3 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag0lbs

Weight210g / 7.41oz

Line retireve per crank0 inch

Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €42.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227

Daiwa 24 TDR QD

Feeder And Match

84.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.99 out of 10

Gear ratio4.8:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight285g / 10.05oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings8+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €229.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3012QD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?

Delphin CarbonIX 2000X

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX

With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios