Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82cm / 32.28 inch) and maximum drag (4 kg). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4 kg), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
