Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX
