Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
