Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X
