Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/257

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and total score (5.56 out of 10). While Delphin CarbonIX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin CarbonIX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX
