Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Delphin ELIXIR
Spinning
53.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Delphin ELIXIR 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Delphin ELIXIR 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin ELIXIR and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X