Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin ELIXIR
Spinning
53.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.19 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight244g / 8.61oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €18.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/350

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Delphin ELIXIR 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Delphin ELIXIR 3000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin ELIXIR and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Delphin ELIXIR 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-HX


Shimano TLD 20X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 14000 XGX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
