Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
57.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight240g / 8oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 20X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin HORNET 20X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin HORNET 20X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
