Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight340g / 11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/500

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 40X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin HORNET 40X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin HORNET 40X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
