Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight340g / 11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/500
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 40X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin HORNET 40X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Delphin HORNET 40X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa BG 4000X
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX