Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight340g / 11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/500

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 40X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin HORNET 40X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Delphin HORNET 40X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R
