Delphin HORNET 40X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight340g / 11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/500

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 40X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin HORNET 40X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin HORNET 40X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
