Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight340g / 11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/500

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 40X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Delphin HORNET 40X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Shimano Complex XR?
Delphin HORNET 40X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX
