Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight340g / 11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/500

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
58.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Conclusion
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 40X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs) and line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). While Delphin HORNET 40X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
