Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight340g / 11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/500

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500FE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 40X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin HORNET 40X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Delphin HORNET 40X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX
