Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
91.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €234.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT?
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X