Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
