Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
