Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400

Daiwa Regal LT
Spinning
54.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa Regal LT?
Delphin HORNET 50X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
