Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX
