Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin HORNET 60X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Delphin HORNET 60X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9.17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
