Delphin HORNET 60X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (520g / 18,34oz). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
