Delphin HORNET 60X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (535g / 18,87oz). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX
