Delphin HORNET 60X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X
