Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X and Delphin HORNET 60X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Delphin HORNET 60X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Solid value at €27.95, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
