Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG?
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
