Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000MHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/120
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX
