Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin HORNET and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Delphin HORNET 60X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX
