Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX
