Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX
