Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X
