Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
