Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG?
Delphin INKS 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
