Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX edges out Delphin INKS 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Delphin INKS 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3+1 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Delphin INKS 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
