Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin INKS 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Delphin INKS 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8.9 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
