Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Delphin INKS

Spinning

54.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.53 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag-

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank-

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDELPHIN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €21.95
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.17 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs

Weight250g / 8.82oz

Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000 HG
Handle typeHandle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140

Conclusion

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI edges out Delphin INKS 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19.84 lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (91cm / 35.83 inch). Still, Delphin INKS 2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 250g / 8,82oz and a ball bearings of 3+1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI

With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19.84 lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish