Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
