Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X
