Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
