Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
