Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Delphin INKS 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Delphin INKS 3000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
